Provost and Academic Affairs

Administrative Unit Checklist

Administrative Unit Checklist

Provost and Academic Affairs NAVIGATION

Use the Administrative Unit Checklist below as a guide when developing your unit assessment plan and report.

1.  Institutional mission and program mission statements:

  • Have you indicated the institutional mission statement?
  • Have you included your unit mission statement?

2.  Departmental/unit intended outcomes:

  • Do you have a manageable number of intended outcomes? 3-6 is common.
  • Have you met and collaborated as a unit in determining your intended outcomes?
  • Are your intended outcomes clear, simple, straightforward, and nontechnical statements of what your program wants to happen as a result of its activities? 

3.  Assessment methods and criteria for success (benchmarks):

  • Have you used multiple means of assessment for each unit intended outcome? For every intended outcome, include at least two means of assessing that outcome.
  • Is there a clear, logical connection between the unit intended outcome and the chosen method of assessment?
  • For any given outcome, have you tried to use direct means of assessment wherever possible (e.g., campus safety public records as opposed to perceptions of public safety)?
  • Have you included enough detail in your plan such that it is clear to any reader what is being assessed how and when?
  • Have you indicated a benchmark for each means of assessment?
  • Is each benchmark stated clearly?
  • In setting each benchmark, have you been ambitious but yet realistic?
  • Do you have unit consensus as to the chosen methods of assessment and benchmarks?

4.  Data/results:

  • Are the data cited in the report relevant in that they help answer the question "were the intended outcomes achieved?"
  • Are sufficient data provided such that the reader can tell that the described assessments actually occurred?

5.  Use of results:

  • Have you indicated actions your program has taken in response to your assessment findings (i.e., have you "closed the loop")?
  • Do the actions cited logically flow from the intended outcomes and assessment methods used?
  • Did you meet and collaborate as a unit when making decisions regarding actions taken in response to the findings?